Talk about titles that mislead, but don't! The episode isn't about "the name of the Doctor". It's about the Name of the Doctor: The Doctor, the title, the name he's chosen for himself, and the secret the revalation of which has ramifications throughout the Whoniverse.
Stephen Moffat left us with a cliffhanger ending that introduced (SPOILER ALERT) John Hurt as a future (?) incarnation of the Doctor. Why the FUCK has he been holding out on us, letting mediocre stories get produced for the second half of Series 7, when he could have made them all awesomely epic and well written? I don't know and I no longer care. Moffat really ought to be sacked and replaced with someone who can write well and do it consistently.
Okay, now that I've gone off on my usual tangent, there was actually a lot to like about this episode and a lot not to like, but nothing I could really stay angry about. Madame Vastra visits a prison, where a deranged convicted murderer waiting to be hanged offers information about the Doctor and Trenzalore in return for his life being spared. The information turns out to be the location of Trenzalore, where the Doctor's future corpse is buried. This sets off the story's action, and things get really bad really quickly.
There were a lot of things I didn't like, chief among them being the complete lack of the Silence, the group led by the Edward Munch-looking aliens, which has been trying to prevent the Doctor from ever going to Trenzalore for fear of what the revelation of his greatest secret will do to them. Well, it seems that, going by what cryptic information this episode gave us, Trenzalore may in fact be the Silents' homeworld, or at least, their primary base of operations, or maybe just the place of their final defeat at the Doctor's hands. We don't know, because nothing was revealed along those lines. Instead, we got the Great Intelligence making another appearance, apparently trying to uncover the Doctor's Big Secret as a means of gaining its final revenge on the Time Lord, in an apparently completely unrelated plot.
Granted, the Doctor faked his death to get the Silence off his back, but still, for all the trouble they cause throughout Series 5 with blowing up the TARDIS and destroying all of Creation, and throughout Series 6 with their ploy to turn Amy Pond's and Rory Williams' daughter into a weapon with which to kill the Doctor, you'd think Moffat would have brought them back. But no, instead we get the Great Intelligence, with no hint as to any previous involvement in any of this, on his own quest to kill the Doctor. That just annoys the hell out of me. Moffat, you botched it again in that department! A pox upon your house!
On the other hand, we finally get the explanation for Clara and how and why she has existed in time and space before. No, she's not Bad Wolf II like I initially thought. Just watch the episode and you'll see. I did like all the appearances of the Doctor's past selves, which included William Hartnell, Patrick Troughton, Jon Pertwee, Tom Baker, Peter Davison, Colin Baker, Sylvester McCoy, and (only as a stuntman dressed in costume) Christopher Eccleston. We didn't get to see Paul McGann or David Tennant, either through footage or stunt doubles, as with the others. That was odd, but we should really see all the Doctors in some way in November for the 50th Anniversary episode. Anything less would be a huge letdown.
Now, as I wrote above, the cliffhanger ending was fantastic and introduced us to a (possibly) future incarnation of the Doctor — perhaps the Final Doctor — played by legendary actor John Hurt. Only Hurt could portray a guilt-wracked Time Lord the way the future and Final Doctor must ultimately be played. Brilliant casting decision there. Oh, and if you're wondering how River Song could be in this episode after her doomed trip to the Library, well, it's Moffat's typically throwaway non-explanation. I'll just say that even with that monumental cheat, the chemistry between Matt Smith and Alex Kingston was superb and undoubtedly caused quite the number of tears for many audience members.
So, I give "The Name of the Doctor" a B+ or A-. Moffat still gets a big fat F- from me, but we'll see how the 50th Anniversary goes.
For an alternate take, go here.
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Review: Nightmare In Silver
I loved the new design for the Cybermen. The story was so-so, and had rather obvious flaws. The chief of these is that the Mondas-originated Cybermen at some point merged with the Cybus Cybermen, according to episode writer Neil Gaiman (who wrote the Series 6 episode "The Doctor's Wife"), but we never actually got to see this, nor was any mention of it made in the episode itself. So we end up with the Doctor managing to delay the Cyber-Planner's invasion of his mind with a gold ticket, a weakness the Cybus Cybermen never had, and no explanation as to why they have it.
The episode was saved somewhat by the incredible acting talents of Matt Smith and guest star Warwick Davis (of Star Wars, Willow, and Leprachaun fame), but neither of these two fine actors was given much to work with. Smith, by the way, has confirmed that he will be returning for Series 8.
I don't know why Moffat is letting such poor writing permeate the second half of Series 7, but the next episode, "The Name of the Doctor", is supposed to be freakin' epic and from all we've been given so far, it's going to be yet another monumental letdown. I don't know if Moffat is trying to get himself fired from the show, but if he is, a simple resignation would have sufficed.
The episode was saved somewhat by the incredible acting talents of Matt Smith and guest star Warwick Davis (of Star Wars, Willow, and Leprachaun fame), but neither of these two fine actors was given much to work with. Smith, by the way, has confirmed that he will be returning for Series 8.
I don't know why Moffat is letting such poor writing permeate the second half of Series 7, but the next episode, "The Name of the Doctor", is supposed to be freakin' epic and from all we've been given so far, it's going to be yet another monumental letdown. I don't know if Moffat is trying to get himself fired from the show, but if he is, a simple resignation would have sufficed.
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
Review: The Crimson Horror
This episode was kind of "meh". Mark Gatiss, who wrote the teleplay, went for comic effect setting the story in 1893 Yorkshire, a year after the second Clara died. People are turning up dead, petrified, and stained crimson, their faces twisted in expressions of horror, hence the title of the episode. The impossible reflection of the Doctor's face in the eyes of the latest victim leads Madame Vastra, her wife and assistant Jenny, and Sontaran manservant Straxx to investigate an organization preaching doomsday and offering the chosen survivors a utopian vision of the future.
As was the case with every episode of Series 7's second half except Cold War, I just wasn't feeling blown away, and I blame that on the diminishing quality of the writing. Head writer and show runner Stephen Moffat keeps promising us big things but always fails to deliver, and that is getting seriously irritating. Neil Gaiman returns to pen the next episode, which features newly revamped Cybermen. I'll let you know how that one goes.
As was the case with every episode of Series 7's second half except Cold War, I just wasn't feeling blown away, and I blame that on the diminishing quality of the writing. Head writer and show runner Stephen Moffat keeps promising us big things but always fails to deliver, and that is getting seriously irritating. Neil Gaiman returns to pen the next episode, which features newly revamped Cybermen. I'll let you know how that one goes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)